I think that Rainsford did have to kill Zarhoff. Zarhoff was the hunter in the story. Rainsford was the huntee, and he killed the hunter. I think that killing Zarhoff was a good thing to do because Zarhoff won't be able to kill people anymore. Since he couldnt be the hunter anymore, nobody else would get hunted by another human. By killing Zarhoff, Rainsford made it much safer for all of the other huntees.
It helps me relate to my understanding of modernism because it is like mortality. Im sure Zarhoff didn't expect to be killed. By not knowing he was going to be killed it presents mortality. It presents this because Zarhoff thought nobody could kill him, but Rainsford did kill him. This is relating to my understanding of modernism, because a part of modernism is making people aware of their mortality. Im sure after getting killed, Zarhoff would've been aware of his mortality.
No comments:
Post a Comment